AVG. Rating
5.0
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
6.3

AirPods 4vs.Blessing 3

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

10%
AirPods 4
Absolute Score: 51.6%
90%
Blessing 3
Absolute Score: 70.5%

Total categories compared: 29

Winner:Blessing 3

( leads by 196.9% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoAirPods 4Blessing 3
BrandAppleMoondrop
CountryUSAChina
IEM DescriptionThe Moondrop Blessing 3 is a hybrid IEM that blends technical detail with a clean, spacious sound. Featuring dual dynamic drivers and four balanced armatures, it delivers tight bass, clear mids, and airy treble with impressive precision. The overall tuning is balanced with a slightly bright edge, making it well-suited for those who enjoy clarity and separation without excessive warmth.
Price Leveln/a100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigHybrid
Driver TypesDynamic Driver + Balanced Armature
Shell Material
Cable
Technical
Freq Range
Impedance (Ω)
Sensitivity (dB)
Crossover
Platform Info
Comments00
Visit Count3685
External Reviews00

Meta Ratings

From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, Blessing 3 conveys sound with substantially enhanced finesse and resolution. For comfort fit, It performs notably better (8.5 vs 5). Craftsmanship-wise, It feels subtly more meticulously assembled, reflecting a level of engineering and attention to detail that elevates the product. Regarding included accessories, It offers a vastly more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.

Sound
Comfort Fit
Build Quality
Stock Cable
Accessories
AirPods 4Blessing 3
Sound
5.0
8.5
Comfort Fit
5.0
8.5
Build Quality
7.0
7.5
Stock Cable
7.3
Accessories
1.5
7.3

Sound Characteristics

Blessing 3 delivers a deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than AirPods 4 (6 vs 4.5). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than AirPods 4 (7.3 vs 5.5). In the upper mids, It sounds n clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than AirPods 4 (7 vs 6). The highest frequencies on It feel b more natural and less rolled-off compared to AirPods 4 (7.3 vs 6.5). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas AirPods 4 sounds more intimate (7.3 vs 6). It extracts low-level details s more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). It organizes musical elements n better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from AirPods 4 (6.3 vs 5). Percussion and quick attacks feel a more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). AirPods 4 handles sibilant sounds d more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Blessing 3 (6.5 vs 4.8). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Blessing 3 (5.5 vs 5). Tonality on Blessing 3 is s more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed d more clearly on It, adding life that AirPods 4 doesn’t quite match (6.8 vs 4.5).

AirPods 4Blessing 3
Sub Bass
4.5
6.0
Bass
5.5
5.5
Bass Feel
5.0
6.8
Lower Mids
5.5
7.3
Upper Mids
6.0
7.0
Lower Treble
6.5
6.8
Upper Treble
6.5
7.3
Sound Stage Width
6.0
7.3
Detail
5.0
6.8
Layering
5.0
6.0
Masking
5.0
5.3
Note Weight
5.0
6.3
Slam
5.0
6.0
Sibilance
6.5
4.8
Timbre Color
5.5
5.0
Tonality
5.0
6.8
Texture
4.5
6.8

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.