Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | AirPods 4 | Blessing 3 |
---|---|---|
Brand | Apple | Moondrop |
Country | USA | China |
IEM Description | – | The Moondrop Blessing 3 is a hybrid IEM that blends technical detail with a clean, spacious sound. Featuring dual dynamic drivers and four balanced armatures, it delivers tight bass, clear mids, and airy treble with impressive precision. The overall tuning is balanced with a slightly bright edge, making it well-suited for those who enjoy clarity and separation without excessive warmth. |
Price Level | n/a | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | Hybrid |
Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 0 |
Visit Count | 36 | 85 |
External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, Blessing 3 conveys sound with substantially enhanced finesse and resolution. For comfort fit, It performs notably better (8.5 vs 5). Craftsmanship-wise, It feels subtly more meticulously assembled, reflecting a level of engineering and attention to detail that elevates the product. Regarding included accessories, It offers a vastly more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
AirPods 4 | Blessing 3 | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 5.0 | 8.5 |
Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 8.5 |
Build Quality | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Stock Cable | – | 7.3 |
Accessories | 1.5 | 7.3 |
Blessing 3 delivers a deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than AirPods 4 (6 vs 4.5). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than AirPods 4 (7.3 vs 5.5). In the upper mids, It sounds n clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than AirPods 4 (7 vs 6). The highest frequencies on It feel b more natural and less rolled-off compared to AirPods 4 (7.3 vs 6.5). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas AirPods 4 sounds more intimate (7.3 vs 6). It extracts low-level details s more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). It organizes musical elements n better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from AirPods 4 (6.3 vs 5). Percussion and quick attacks feel a more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). AirPods 4 handles sibilant sounds d more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Blessing 3 (6.5 vs 4.8). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Blessing 3 (5.5 vs 5). Tonality on Blessing 3 is s more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed d more clearly on It, adding life that AirPods 4 doesn’t quite match (6.8 vs 4.5).
AirPods 4 | Blessing 3 | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Bass | 5.5 | 5.5 |
Bass Feel | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Lower Mids | 5.5 | 7.3 |
Upper Mids | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Lower Treble | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Upper Treble | 6.5 | 7.3 |
Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 7.3 |
Detail | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Layering | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Masking | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Note Weight | 5.0 | 6.3 |
Slam | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Sibilance | 6.5 | 4.8 |
Timbre Color | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Tonality | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Texture | 4.5 | 6.8 |
// Nothing to compare yet.