Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | AirPods 4 | EDC Pro |
---|---|---|
Brand | Apple | KZ Earphones |
Country | USA | China |
IEM Description | – | – |
Price Level | n/a | < 100 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | Single Dyn. Driver |
Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 0 |
Visit Count | 36 | 31 |
External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
EDC Pro delivers distinctly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to AirPods 4 (7.2 vs 5). For comfort fit, It performs considerably better (7.8 vs 5). While EDC Pro is passable in its design, AirPods 4 stands distinctly above, particularly in terms of assembly quality, material choice, and finish. EDC Pro's accessories are distinctly better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to AirPods 4.
AirPods 4 | EDC Pro | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 5.0 | 7.5 |
Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 8.0 |
Build Quality | 7.0 | 5.8 |
Stock Cable | – | 5.0 |
Accessories | 1.5 | 4.0 |
EDC Pro delivers b deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than AirPods 4 (5 vs 4.5). It offers a stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where AirPods 4 feels less assertive (8 vs 5.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It m more engaging during high-dynamic passages (7 vs 5). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5.5). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with s more brilliance on It, while AirPods 4 sounds slightly dull (7 vs 6.5). The highest frequencies on AirPods 4 feel s more natural and less rolled-off compared to EDC Pro (6.5 vs 5). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas EDC Pro sounds more intimate (6 vs 3). In complex arrangements, It separates layers s more distinctly, preventing overlap that EDC Pro occasionally suffers (5 vs 3). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing a better handling of masking than EDC Pro (5 vs 3). It handles sibilant sounds a more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than EDC Pro (6.5 vs 3). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of EDC Pro (5.5 vs 5). The overall tonality of It is a more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than EDC Pro (5 vs 4). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered c more vividly by EDC Pro, while AirPods 4 feels flatter (7 vs 4.5).
AirPods 4 | EDC Pro | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Bass | 5.5 | 8.0 |
Bass Feel | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Lower Mids | 5.5 | 7.0 |
Upper Mids | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Lower Treble | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Upper Treble | 6.5 | 5.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 3.0 |
Detail | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Layering | 5.0 | 3.0 |
Masking | 5.0 | 3.0 |
Note Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Slam | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Sibilance | 6.5 | 3.0 |
Timbre Color | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Tonality | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Texture | 4.5 | 7.0 |
// Nothing to compare yet.