AirPods 4vs.Kato
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | AirPods 4 | Kato |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Apple | Moondrop |
| Country | USA | China |
| IEM Description | – | – |
| Price Level | n/a | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | – | Single Dyn. Driver |
| Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 36 | 21 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
For comfort fit, AirPods 4 performs slightly better (5 vs 4.5). Kato’s bundled components feel vastly more premium, suggesting a stronger focus on user satisfaction and long-term value.
| AirPods 4 | Kato | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Build Quality | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Stock Cable | – | 6.0 |
| Accessories | 1.5 | 6.5 |
Sound Characteristics
AirPods 4 produces sub-bass that is d more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (4.5 vs 3). It renders bass with m greater punch and separation, where Kato sometimes feels bloated (5.5 vs 4). It translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Kato lacks this tactile feedback (5 vs 3). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Kato (5.5 vs 4). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Kato (6 vs 4). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with m more brilliance on It, while Kato sounds slightly dull (6.5 vs 5). The upper treble of It extends a further, offering more sparkle and openness than Kato (6.5 vs 5). The stereo field on It feels m wider and more holographic, whereas Kato sounds more intimate (6 vs 4). It extracts low-level details a more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Kato (5 vs 4). It organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over Kato (5 vs 4.5). It keeps competing frequencies under control n more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Kato (5 vs 4). It adds m more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Kato (5 vs 2). It delivers m stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than Kato (5 vs 2). It controls harsh sibilant peaks s more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Kato (6.5 vs 4). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Kato (5.5 vs 5). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered b more vividly by Kato, while AirPods 4 feels flatter (5 vs 4.5).
| AirPods 4 | Kato | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Bass | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| Bass Feel | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Lower Mids | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| Upper Mids | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Lower Treble | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Upper Treble | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Detail | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Layering | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Masking | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Note Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Slam | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Sibilance | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| Timbre Color | 5.5 | 5.0 |
| Tonality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Texture | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.