Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | AirPods 4 | SLIIVO SL224 |
---|---|---|
Brand | Apple | Myer Audio |
Country | USA | – |
IEM Description | – | – |
Price Level | n/a | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | – |
Driver Types | – | – |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 0 |
Visit Count | 36 | 10 |
External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Compared to AirPods 4, SLIIVO SL224 creates a measurably wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth. For comfort fit, It performs measurably better (6.5 vs 5). The structural integrity of AirPods 4 is evidently more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that SLIIVO SL224 struggles to match. Accessory-wise, SLIIVO SL224 includes materially more practical and high-quality items, enhancing both protection and usability.
AirPods 4 | SLIIVO SL224 | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 6.5 |
Build Quality | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Stock Cable | – | 5.0 |
Accessories | 1.5 | 5.0 |
SLIIVO SL224 delivers a deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than AirPods 4 (5.5 vs 4.5). The low-end on It is s more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than AirPods 4 (6 vs 5.5). The bass in It feels d more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). It achieves m better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (7.5 vs 5.5). In the upper mids, It sounds m clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than AirPods 4 (7.5 vs 6). The treble on It is a more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (7.5 vs 6.5). The upper treble of It extends e further, offering more sparkle and openness than AirPods 4 (7.5 vs 6.5). It paints a c broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (7 vs 6). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is m more convincing, while AirPods 4 tends to gloss over them (7 vs 5). In complex arrangements, It separates layers a more distinctly, preventing overlap that AirPods 4 occasionally suffers (6 vs 5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing m better handling of masking than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). Percussion and quick attacks feel a more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). Listeners may experience a fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas AirPods 4 can get fatiguing (8 vs 6.5). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5.5). Tonality on It is a more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). It renders texture m more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than AirPods 4 (7 vs 4.5).
AirPods 4 | SLIIVO SL224 | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 4.5 | 5.5 |
Bass | 5.5 | 6.0 |
Bass Feel | 5.0 | 6.5 |
Lower Mids | 5.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Mids | 6.0 | 7.5 |
Lower Treble | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Detail | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Layering | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Masking | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Note Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Slam | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Sibilance | 6.5 | 8.0 |
Timbre Color | 5.5 | 6.5 |
Tonality | 5.0 | 6.5 |
Texture | 4.5 | 7.0 |
// Nothing to compare yet.