AirPods 4vs.Tea Pro
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | AirPods 4 | Tea Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Apple | XENNS Mangird |
| Country | USA | – |
| IEM Description | – | – |
| Price Level | n/a | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | – | – |
| Driver Types | – | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 36 | 65 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
Compared to AirPods 4, Tea Pro creates a significantly wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth. For comfort fit, It performs significantly better (6.5 vs 5). While Tea Pro is passable in its design, AirPods 4 stands faintly above, particularly in terms of assembly quality, material choice, and finish. Regarding included accessories, Tea Pro offers a decisively more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
| AirPods 4 | Tea Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Build Quality | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | – | 6.5 |
| Accessories | 1.5 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Tea Pro delivers d deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than AirPods 4 (6 vs 4.5). The low-end on It is s more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5.5). It adds m more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). The lower midrange on It blends a more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5.5). The treble on It is a more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (7 vs 6.5). The upper treble of It extends m further, offering more sparkle and openness than AirPods 4 (8 vs 6.5). It paints a n broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (7 vs 6). With d higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). The note presentation is m fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). It hits with a more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). AirPods 4 handles sibilant sounds a more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Tea Pro (6.5 vs 6). Tea Pro presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that AirPods 4 lacks (7 vs 5.5). Tonality on It is m more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed m more clearly on It, adding life that AirPods 4 doesn’t quite match (6 vs 4.5).
| AirPods 4 | Tea Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 4.5 | 6.0 |
| Bass | 5.5 | 7.0 |
| Bass Feel | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Lower Mids | 5.5 | 6.5 |
| Upper Mids | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Lower Treble | 6.5 | 7.0 |
| Upper Treble | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Detail | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Layering | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Masking | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Note Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Slam | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Sibilance | 6.5 | 6.0 |
| Timbre Color | 5.5 | 7.0 |
| Tonality | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Texture | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.