AirPods 4vs.x Gizaudio DaVinci

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Sound-wise, x Gizaudio DaVinci provides a distinctly more refined presentation, with improved detail retrieval, microdynamics, and instrument layering when compared to AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). For comfort fit, It performs measurably better (7 vs 5). From the case design to ear tip variety, It provides a immensely more thoughtful unboxing experience.

Sound Characteristics

x Gizaudio DaVinci delivers m tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than AirPods 4 (7 vs 4.5). It renders bass with s greater punch and separation, where AirPods 4 sometimes feels bloated (7.5 vs 5.5). It translates bass vibrations into a s more visceral experience, while AirPods 4 lacks this tactile feedback (7.8 vs 5). It renders lower mids m more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5.5). In the upper mids, It sounds a clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 6). The treble on AirPods 4 is a more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (6.5 vs 5.8). It captures ambient cues and reverbs s more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over x Gizaudio DaVinci (6.5 vs 5). It paints a b broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (6 vs 5.5). x Gizaudio DaVinci organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing s better handling of masking than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). Notes on It feel d more grounded and weighty, whereas AirPods 4 can sound thin or hollow (6.5 vs 5). It hits with s more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). The upper range of vocals is d cleaner and more forgiving on AirPods 4, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that x Gizaudio DaVinci shows (6.5 vs 4.3). x Gizaudio DaVinci renders timbres with m better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than AirPods 4 (7.8 vs 5.5). The overall tonality of It is m more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered d more vividly by It, while AirPods 4 feels flatter (6 vs 4.5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.