Glaciervs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

For comfort fit, Glacier performs softly better (8.2 vs 7.3). While Mk12 Turris is passable in its design, It stands distinctly above, particularly in terms of assembly quality, material choice, and finish. Users may find the It cable notably more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability. It's accessories are substantially better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Mk12 Turris.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers a deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than Glacier (8.5 vs 7.5). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Glacier (8 vs 7.5). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to Glacier (8.5 vs 8). Male vocals and lower instruments sound m richer and better defined on It, unlike Glacier which can seem hollow (9 vs 7). In the upper mids, It sounds a clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than Glacier (8 vs 7.3). It offers m greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that Glacier misses (9 vs 7.5). It captures ambient cues and reverbs a more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over Glacier (9 vs 8). Glacier paints a a broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (8.5 vs 8). It extracts low-level details a more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Mk12 Turris separates instruments a more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where Glacier blends them (8.5 vs 8). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing e better handling of masking than Glacier (8.5 vs 7.5). It adds a more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Glacier (8.5 vs 6). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that Glacier shows (9.5 vs 8.5). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Glacier (8.5 vs 7.5). Tonality on It is a more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than Glacier (8.5 vs 7). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered a more vividly by It, while Glacier feels flatter (8 vs 7.5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.