Blessing 3vs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Compared to Mk12 Turris, Blessing 3 creates a subtly wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth. For comfort fit, It performs clearly better (8.5 vs 7.3). The included cable with It shows considerably better strain relief and physical resilience. It’s bundled components feel measurably more premium, suggesting a stronger focus on user satisfaction and long-term value.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers n deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than Blessing 3 (8.5 vs 6). It renders bass with m greater punch and separation, where Blessing 3 sometimes feels bloated (8 vs 5.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It d more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 6.8). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (9 vs 7.3). It reproduces female vocals and strings with c more air and forwardness, while Blessing 3 remains recessed (8 vs 7). It provides a more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Blessing 3 (9 vs 6.8). The highest frequencies on It feel d more natural and less rolled-off compared to Blessing 3 (9 vs 7.3). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Blessing 3 sounds more intimate (8 vs 7.3). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is m more convincing, while Blessing 3 tends to gloss over them (8.5 vs 6.8). In complex arrangements, It separates layers s more distinctly, preventing overlap that Blessing 3 occasionally suffers (8.5 vs 6). It keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Blessing 3 (8.5 vs 5.3). It adds m more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Blessing 3 (8.5 vs 6.3). It delivers m stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than Blessing 3 (7.5 vs 6). It controls harsh sibilant peaks overwhelmingly more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Blessing 3 (9.5 vs 4.8). It renders timbres with c better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Blessing 3 (8.5 vs 5). Across the frequency range, It stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Blessing 3 (8.5 vs 6.8). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that Blessing 3 doesn’t quite match (8 vs 6.8).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.