Blessing 3vs.Project Meta
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Blessing 3 | Project Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Moondrop | CrinEar |
| Country | China | – |
| IEM Description | The Moondrop Blessing 3 is a hybrid IEM that blends technical detail with a clean, spacious sound. Featuring dual dynamic drivers and four balanced armatures, it delivers tight bass, clear mids, and airy treble with impressive precision. The overall tuning is balanced with a slightly bright edge, making it well-suited for those who enjoy clarity and separation without excessive warmth. | A debut IEM by Crinacle's CrinEar: a compact, full-aluminum flagship tuned to a “tilted Diffuse Field + bass boost” curve. Delivers vibrant mids, warm sub-bass, and clear treble—crafted for musical accuracy and comfort. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Hybrid | – |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 85 | 96 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 1 |
Meta Ratings
Sound-wise, Blessing 3 provides a measurably more refined presentation, with improved detail retrieval, microdynamics, and instrument layering when compared to Project Meta (8.5 vs 7). For comfort fit, It performs measurably better (8.5 vs 6.5). It shows evidently superior build quality than Project Meta (7.5 vs 6.5), indicating better materials, construction precision, and overall durability. The included cable with It shows softly better strain relief and physical resilience. Regarding included accessories, It offers a evidently more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
| Blessing 3 | Project Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Build Quality | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | 7.3 | 6.5 |
| Accessories | 7.3 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Project Meta renders bass with a greater punch and separation, where Blessing 3 sometimes feels bloated (6 vs 5.5). Blessing 3 renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Project Meta (7.3 vs 6.5). Upper mids are s more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Project Meta (7 vs 5.5). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with a more brilliance on Project Meta, while Blessing 3 sounds slightly dull (7.5 vs 6.8). Blessing 3 captures ambient cues and reverbs b more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over Project Meta (7.3 vs 6.5). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Project Meta (7.3 vs 6). With s higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than Project Meta (6.8 vs 6). Project Meta separates instruments a more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where Blessing 3 blends them (6.5 vs 6). It controls harsh sibilant peaks m more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Blessing 3 (6.5 vs 4.8). Timbre on It sounds c more realistic and natural, whereas Blessing 3 feels slightly more artificial or colored (6 vs 5). Across the frequency range, Blessing 3 stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Project Meta (6.8 vs 6). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered a more vividly by It, while Project Meta feels flatter (6.8 vs 5.5).
| Blessing 3 | Project Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bass | 5.5 | 6.0 |
| Bass Feel | 6.8 | 6.5 |
| Lower Mids | 7.3 | 6.5 |
| Upper Mids | 7.0 | 5.5 |
| Lower Treble | 6.8 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 7.3 | 6.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 7.3 | 6.0 |
| Detail | 6.8 | 6.0 |
| Layering | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Masking | 5.3 | 5.5 |
| Note Weight | 6.3 | 6.0 |
| Slam | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Sibilance | 4.8 | 6.5 |
| Timbre Color | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Tonality | 6.8 | 6.0 |
| Texture | 6.8 | 5.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.