AVG. Rating
7.9
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
7.6

Cantorvs.DK3001BD (Braindance)

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

94%
Cantor
Absolute Score: 82.3%
6%
DK3001BD (Braindance)
Absolute Score: 68.2%

Total categories compared: 17

Winner:Cantor

( leads by 142.4% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoCantorDK3001BD (Braindance)
BrandAFULDUNU
CountryTaiwanChina
IEM DescriptionThe AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch.A sleek and technical IEM with impactful sub-bass and crisp treble. Built for clarity and resolution, wrapped in a stylish metal-ceramic shell with modular cable options.
Price Level500 – 1.000100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigMulti-BATribrid
Driver TypesBalanced ArmatureMicro Planar Tweeter + Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature
Shell MaterialCNC-milled aluminum alloy, zirconia-coated faceplate
Cable4Braid 5N OFC CableHigh-purity OCC copper, 4-core, fabric sleeved
Technical
Freq Range5 Hz – 40 kHz
Impedance (Ω)2026
Sensitivity (dB)106108
CrossoverRLC Network Electronic Crossover
Platform Info
Comments11
Visit Count128242
External Reviews11

Meta Ratings

// Nothing to compare yet.

Sound Characteristics

Cantor enhances basslines with a more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to DK3001BD (Braindance) (9 vs 6.3). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to DK3001BD (Braindance) (8.5 vs 5.8). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on It, unlike DK3001BD (Braindance) which can seem hollow (8.5 vs 6.3). It strikes a a better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to DK3001BD (Braindance) (8 vs 6.5). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with a more brilliance on It, while DK3001BD (Braindance) sounds slightly dull (8 vs 6.8). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than DK3001BD (Braindance) (8.3 vs 7.5). It keeps competing frequencies under control s more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to DK3001BD (Braindance) (8 vs 6.5). The note presentation is a fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than DK3001BD (Braindance) (7.5 vs 6.3). Percussion and quick attacks feel c more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over DK3001BD (Braindance) (8.5 vs 5.8). It handles sibilant sounds e more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than DK3001BD (Braindance) (8.5 vs 7.5). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas DK3001BD (Braindance) feels slightly more artificial or colored (7.5 vs 6.5). The overall tonality of It is m more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than DK3001BD (Braindance) (8.8 vs 6). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with a more realism, enhancing emotional depth over DK3001BD (Braindance) (8 vs 5.8).

CantorDK3001BD (Braindance)
Sub Bass
8.5
8.3
Bass
9.0
6.3
Bass Feel
8.5
5.8
Lower Mids
8.5
6.3
Upper Mids
8.0
6.5
Lower Treble
8.0
6.8
Upper Treble
7.5
7.8
Sound Stage Width
8.0
7.8
Detail
8.8
8.5
Layering
8.3
7.5
Masking
8.0
6.5
Note Weight
7.5
6.3
Slam
8.5
5.8
Sibilance
8.5
7.5
Timbre Color
7.5
6.5
Tonality
8.8
6.0
Texture
8.0
5.8

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.