Cantorvs.SLIIVO SL224
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Cantor | SLIIVO SL224 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AFUL | Myer Audio |
| Country | Taiwan | – |
| IEM Description | The AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch. | – |
| Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Multi-BA | – |
| Driver Types | Balanced Armature | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | 4Braid 5N OFC Cable | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | 20 | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 106 | – |
| Crossover | RLC Network Electronic Crossover | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 1 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 128 | 10 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
// Nothing to compare yet.
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on Cantor feels c more natural and authoritative, while SLIIVO SL224 lacks some reach (8.5 vs 5.5). It renders bass with n greater punch and separation, where SLIIVO SL224 sometimes feels bloated (9 vs 6). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to SLIIVO SL224 (8.5 vs 6.5). The lower midrange on It blends a more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in SLIIVO SL224 (8.5 vs 7.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with a more air and forwardness, while SLIIVO SL224 remains recessed (8 vs 7.5). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with a more brilliance on It, while SLIIVO SL224 sounds slightly dull (8 vs 7.5). It paints a a broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (8 vs 7). With a higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than SLIIVO SL224 (8.8 vs 7). It separates instruments d more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where SLIIVO SL224 blends them (8.3 vs 6). It keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to SLIIVO SL224 (8 vs 7). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from SLIIVO SL224 (7.5 vs 7). It delivers dynamic shifts with m greater impact, making SLIIVO SL224 sound comparatively tame (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that SLIIVO SL224 shows (8.5 vs 8). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that SLIIVO SL224 lacks (7.5 vs 6.5). Across the frequency range, It stays s more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than SLIIVO SL224 (8.8 vs 6.5). It renders texture a more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than SLIIVO SL224 (8 vs 7).
| Cantor | SLIIVO SL224 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 8.5 | 5.5 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Lower Mids | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Detail | 8.8 | 7.0 |
| Layering | 8.3 | 6.0 |
| Masking | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Note Weight | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Slam | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Sibilance | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Timbre Color | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Tonality | 8.8 | 6.5 |
| Texture | 8.0 | 7.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.