Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Cantor | x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko |
---|---|---|
Brand | AFUL | 7Hz |
Country | Taiwan | UK |
IEM Description | The AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch. | 7Hz x Crinacle Salnotes Dioko is a budget planar magnetic IEM featuring a 14.6 mm dual‑cavity planar diaphragm driver and high‑grade aluminum housing. With Crinacle‑approved tuning, it offers clear mids, airy treble, and crisp bass response, all bundled with premium accessories like a detachable OCC‑copper braided cable and over‑engineered carrying case. A standout value under ~$100 in audiophile in-ear monitors. |
Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Multi-BA | Planar Magnetic |
Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Planar Magnetic Driver |
Shell Material | – | Aviation Aluminium Housing |
Cable | 4Braid 5N OFC Cable | Removable 4-Core Litz OCC Copper Cable |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 5-40000 hz |
Impedance (Ω) | 20 | 16 |
Sensitivity (dB) | 106 | 106 |
Crossover | RLC Network Electronic Crossover | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 1 | 0 |
Visit Count | 128 | 16 |
External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
// Nothing to compare yet.
Low-frequency extension on Cantor feels m more natural and authoritative, while x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko lacks some reach (8.5 vs 6.5). It renders bass with a greater punch and separation, where x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko sometimes feels bloated (9 vs 6). It translates bass vibrations into a c more visceral experience, while x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 5.5). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (8.5 vs 6.5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8 vs 7.5). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8 vs 6.5). x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Cantor (8.5 vs 8). Notes on Cantor feel d more grounded and weighty, whereas x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko can sound thin or hollow (7.5 vs 5.5). Percussion and quick attacks feel overwhelmingly more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8.5 vs 4.5). It handles sibilant sounds m more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8.5 vs 6). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (7.5 vs 6.5). It achieves d better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8.8 vs 7). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered a more vividly by It, while x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko feels flatter (8 vs 7.5).
Cantor | x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 8.5 | 6.5 |
Bass | 9.0 | 6.0 |
Bass Feel | 8.5 | 5.5 |
Lower Mids | 8.5 | 6.5 |
Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
Lower Treble | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Upper Treble | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 6.5 |
Detail | 8.8 | 8.5 |
Layering | 8.3 | 8.0 |
Masking | 8.0 | 8.5 |
Note Weight | 7.5 | 5.5 |
Slam | 8.5 | 4.5 |
Sibilance | 8.5 | 6.0 |
Timbre Color | 7.5 | 6.5 |
Tonality | 8.8 | 7.0 |
Texture | 8.0 | 7.5 |
// Nothing to compare yet.