AVG. Rating
7.9
IEM AIEM B
VS

Cantorvs.x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

84%
Cantor
Absolute Score: 82.3%
16%
x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko
Absolute Score: 68.2%

Total categories compared: 17

Winner:Cantor

( leads by 143.5% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoCantorx Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko
BrandAFUL7Hz
CountryTaiwanUK
IEM DescriptionThe AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch.7Hz x Crinacle Salnotes Dioko is a budget planar magnetic IEM featuring a 14.6 mm dual‑cavity planar diaphragm driver and high‑grade aluminum housing. With Crinacle‑approved tuning, it offers clear mids, airy treble, and crisp bass response, all bundled with premium accessories like a detachable OCC‑copper braided cable and over‑engineered carrying case. A standout value under ~$100 in audiophile in-ear monitors.
Price Level500 – 1.000100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigMulti-BAPlanar Magnetic
Driver TypesBalanced ArmaturePlanar Magnetic Driver
Shell MaterialAviation Aluminium Housing
Cable4Braid 5N OFC CableRemovable 4-Core Litz OCC Copper Cable
Technical
Freq Range5-40000 hz
Impedance (Ω)2016
Sensitivity (dB)106106
CrossoverRLC Network Electronic Crossover
Platform Info
Comments10
Visit Count12816
External Reviews10

Meta Ratings

// Nothing to compare yet.

Sound Characteristics

Low-frequency extension on Cantor feels m more natural and authoritative, while x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko lacks some reach (8.5 vs 6.5). It renders bass with a greater punch and separation, where x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko sometimes feels bloated (9 vs 6). It translates bass vibrations into a c more visceral experience, while x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 5.5). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (8.5 vs 6.5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8 vs 7.5). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8 vs 6.5). x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Cantor (8.5 vs 8). Notes on Cantor feel d more grounded and weighty, whereas x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko can sound thin or hollow (7.5 vs 5.5). Percussion and quick attacks feel overwhelmingly more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8.5 vs 4.5). It handles sibilant sounds m more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8.5 vs 6). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (7.5 vs 6.5). It achieves d better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (8.8 vs 7). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered a more vividly by It, while x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko feels flatter (8 vs 7.5).

Cantorx Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko
Sub Bass
8.5
6.5
Bass
9.0
6.0
Bass Feel
8.5
5.5
Lower Mids
8.5
6.5
Upper Mids
8.0
7.5
Lower Treble
8.0
8.0
Upper Treble
7.5
7.5
Sound Stage Width
8.0
6.5
Detail
8.8
8.5
Layering
8.3
8.0
Masking
8.0
8.5
Note Weight
7.5
5.5
Slam
8.5
4.5
Sibilance
8.5
6.0
Timbre Color
7.5
6.5
Tonality
8.8
7.0
Texture
8.0
7.5

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.