Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Cantor | x HBB Punch |
---|---|---|
Brand | AFUL | Kiwi Ears |
Country | Taiwan | UK |
IEM Description | The AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch. | A bold tribrid IEM designed for bass lovers, combining deep 15 dB-boosted sub-bass, clean mids, and crisp treble with dual EST drivers—housed in a sturdy hybrid shell with detachable, customizable cable. |
Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Multi-BA | Tribrid |
Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
Shell Material | – | Resin |
Cable | 4Braid 5N OFC Cable | Single-crystal copper 20 AWG, 1.45 mm braided, PVC sleeve |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 5 Hz – 44 kHz |
Impedance (Ω) | 20 | 12 |
Sensitivity (dB) | 106 | 98 |
Crossover | RLC Network Electronic Crossover | 3-way passive with dedicated acoustic sound tubes |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 2 | 1 |
Visit Count | 144 | 115 |
External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
// Nothing to compare yet.
x HBB Punch delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Cantor (9.5 vs 8.5). The low-end on Cantor is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than x HBB Punch (9 vs 8.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on x HBB Punch s more engaging during high-dynamic passages (9 vs 8.5). Male vocals and lower instruments sound n richer and better defined on Cantor, unlike x HBB Punch which can seem hollow (8.5 vs 7.3). In the upper mids, It sounds a clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than x HBB Punch (8 vs 7.3). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with b more brilliance on It, while x HBB Punch sounds slightly dull (8 vs 7.5). The highest frequencies on x HBB Punch feel a more natural and less rolled-off compared to Cantor (8 vs 7.5). Cantor creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than x HBB Punch (8 vs 7.3). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while x HBB Punch tends to gloss over them (8.8 vs 7.3). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than x HBB Punch (8.3 vs 7.5). The note presentation is a fuller and more tactile on x HBB Punch, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than Cantor (9 vs 7.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with s greater impact, making Cantor sound comparatively tame (9 vs 8.5). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that Cantor shows (9 vs 8.5). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas Cantor feels slightly more artificial or colored (8 vs 7.5). It achieves c better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Cantor (10 vs 8.8). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that Cantor doesn’t quite match (10 vs 8).
Cantor | x HBB Punch | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 8.5 | 9.5 |
Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
Bass Feel | 8.5 | 9.0 |
Lower Mids | 8.5 | 7.3 |
Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.3 |
Lower Treble | 8.0 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 7.3 |
Detail | 8.8 | 7.3 |
Layering | 8.3 | 7.5 |
Masking | 8.0 | 7.8 |
Note Weight | 7.5 | 9.0 |
Slam | 8.5 | 9.0 |
Sibilance | 8.5 | 9.0 |
Timbre Color | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Tonality | 8.8 | 10.0 |
Texture | 8.0 | 10.0 |
// Nothing to compare yet.