AVG. Rating
7.9
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
7.8

Cantorvs.x HBB Punch

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

47%
Cantor
Absolute Score: 82.3%
53%
x HBB Punch
Absolute Score: 83.5%

Total categories compared: 17

Winner:x HBB Punch

( leads by 48.2% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoCantorx HBB Punch
BrandAFULKiwi Ears
CountryTaiwanUK
IEM DescriptionThe AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch.A bold tribrid IEM designed for bass lovers, combining deep 15 dB-boosted sub-bass, clean mids, and crisp treble with dual EST drivers—housed in a sturdy hybrid shell with detachable, customizable cable.
Price Level500 – 1.000100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigMulti-BATribrid
Driver TypesBalanced ArmatureDynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic
Shell MaterialResin
Cable4Braid 5N OFC CableSingle-crystal copper 20 AWG, 1.45 mm braided, PVC sleeve
Technical
Freq Range5 Hz – 44 kHz
Impedance (Ω)2012
Sensitivity (dB)10698
CrossoverRLC Network Electronic Crossover3-way passive with dedicated acoustic sound tubes
Platform Info
Comments21
Visit Count144115
External Reviews11

Meta Ratings

// Nothing to compare yet.

Sound Characteristics

x HBB Punch delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Cantor (9.5 vs 8.5). The low-end on Cantor is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than x HBB Punch (9 vs 8.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on x HBB Punch s more engaging during high-dynamic passages (9 vs 8.5). Male vocals and lower instruments sound n richer and better defined on Cantor, unlike x HBB Punch which can seem hollow (8.5 vs 7.3). In the upper mids, It sounds a clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than x HBB Punch (8 vs 7.3). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with b more brilliance on It, while x HBB Punch sounds slightly dull (8 vs 7.5). The highest frequencies on x HBB Punch feel a more natural and less rolled-off compared to Cantor (8 vs 7.5). Cantor creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than x HBB Punch (8 vs 7.3). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while x HBB Punch tends to gloss over them (8.8 vs 7.3). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than x HBB Punch (8.3 vs 7.5). The note presentation is a fuller and more tactile on x HBB Punch, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than Cantor (9 vs 7.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with s greater impact, making Cantor sound comparatively tame (9 vs 8.5). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that Cantor shows (9 vs 8.5). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas Cantor feels slightly more artificial or colored (8 vs 7.5). It achieves c better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Cantor (10 vs 8.8). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that Cantor doesn’t quite match (10 vs 8).

Cantorx HBB Punch
Sub Bass
8.5
9.5
Bass
9.0
8.5
Bass Feel
8.5
9.0
Lower Mids
8.5
7.3
Upper Mids
8.0
7.3
Lower Treble
8.0
7.5
Upper Treble
7.5
8.0
Sound Stage Width
8.0
7.3
Detail
8.8
7.3
Layering
8.3
7.5
Masking
8.0
7.8
Note Weight
7.5
9.0
Slam
8.5
9.0
Sibilance
8.5
9.0
Timbre Color
7.5
8.0
Tonality
8.8
10.0
Texture
8.0
10.0

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.