Cantorvs.ZS10 Pro 2
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Cantor | ZS10 Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AFUL | KZ Earphones |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| IEM Description | The AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch. | – |
| Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | < 100 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Multi-BA | Hybrid |
| Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | 4Braid 5N OFC Cable | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | 20 | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 106 | – |
| Crossover | RLC Network Electronic Crossover | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 1 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 128 | 22 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
// Nothing to compare yet.
Sound Characteristics
Cantor delivers c deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than ZS10 Pro 2 (8.5 vs 5). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than ZS10 Pro 2 (9 vs 8.5). ZS10 Pro 2 translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Cantor lacks this tactile feedback (9 vs 8.5). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on Cantor, unlike ZS10 Pro 2 which can seem hollow (8.5 vs 7.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with a more air and forwardness, while ZS10 Pro 2 remains recessed (8 vs 7.5). ZS10 Pro 2 provides a more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Cantor (8.5 vs 8). The upper treble of It extends s further, offering more sparkle and openness than Cantor (8 vs 7.5). Listeners may notice that Cantor presents sounds with a more lateral space, giving recordings more openness than ZS10 Pro 2 (8 vs 6.5). With a higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than ZS10 Pro 2 (8.8 vs 8). Track elements feel s more isolated and clean on ZS10 Pro 2, offering clearer focus than Cantor (9 vs 8.3). Notes on It feel b more grounded and weighty, whereas Cantor can sound thin or hollow (8 vs 7.5). Listeners may experience n fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with Cantor, whereas ZS10 Pro 2 can get fatiguing (8.5 vs 5). It renders timbres with s better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than ZS10 Pro 2 (7.5 vs 5). Across the frequency range, It stays c more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than ZS10 Pro 2 (8.8 vs 5). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered a more vividly by ZS10 Pro 2, while Cantor feels flatter (8.5 vs 8).
| Cantor | ZS10 Pro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 8.5 | 5.0 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 9.0 |
| Lower Mids | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Upper Treble | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| Detail | 8.8 | 8.0 |
| Layering | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Masking | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Note Weight | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Slam | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Sibilance | 8.5 | 5.0 |
| Timbre Color | 7.5 | 5.0 |
| Tonality | 8.8 | 5.0 |
| Texture | 8.0 | 8.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.