Castorvs.MagicOne
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Castor | MagicOne |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | KZ Earphones | AFUL |
| Country | China | Taiwan |
| IEM Description | The KZ Castor brings an engaging and lively sound signature tailored for everyday enjoyment. With its bold tuning and modern presentation, it’s designed for listeners who want excitement and energy without breaking the bank. | – |
| Price Level | < 100 | < 100 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Multi Dyn. Driver | Single Bal. Armature |
| Driver Types | – | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 1 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 40 | 47 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
For comfort fit, Castor performs subtly better (7 vs 6.5). From the connector housings to the shell seams, It demonstrates markedly tighter tolerances and higher production standards. The stock cable of MagicOne is overwhelmingly higher in quality (7.3 vs 3), offering improvements in flexibility, tactile feedback, and resistance to microphonics. Compared to Castor, the overall accessory offering from It is immensely more aligned with the expectations of discerning audiophiles.
| Castor | MagicOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 7.0 | 6.8 |
| Comfort Fit | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Build Quality | 7.0 | 5.5 |
| Stock Cable | 3.0 | 7.3 |
| Accessories | 2.0 | 6.3 |
Sound Characteristics
// Nothing to compare yet.
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.