CP622Bvs.Nova
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | CP622B | Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canpur | Truthear |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| IEM Description | The Canpur CP622B is a flagship in-ear monitor that turned heads at CanJam SoCal 2023, earning strong praise from audiophiles for its exceptional sound and refined design. Originating from a rising EU-based brand, the CP622B quickly stood out as more than a fleeting trend, delivering a listening experience that blends technical precision with musical engagement. This in-depth review explores what makes the CP622B a lasting favorite in the high-end IEM market. | – |
| Price Level | 2.000 + | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Tribrid | Hybrid |
| Driver Types | Bone Conduction + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 16 | 11 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
Compared to Nova, CP622B creates a measurably wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth.
| CP622B | Nova | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 8.5 | – |
| Build Quality | 8.0 | – |
| Stock Cable | 8.5 | – |
| Accessories | – | – |
Sound Characteristics
CP622B produces sub-bass that is m more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (9 vs 7). It enhances basslines with a more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Nova (9 vs 7). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to Nova (8.5 vs 7). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on It, unlike Nova which can seem hollow (9 vs 7). It strikes a s better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to Nova (9 vs 7). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with m more brilliance on It, while Nova sounds slightly dull (9 vs 7). The highest frequencies on It feel c more natural and less rolled-off compared to Nova (9 vs 6.5). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is m more convincing, while Nova tends to gloss over them (9 vs 7). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Nova (8.5 vs 6.5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing a better handling of masking than Nova (8 vs 7). Notes played through It feel n weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from Nova (8 vs 7). It hits with a more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than Nova (8.5 vs 6).
| CP622B | Nova | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Lower Mids | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Upper Mids | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Upper Treble | 9.0 | 6.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | – | 6.5 |
| Detail | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Layering | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Masking | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Note Weight | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Slam | 8.5 | 6.0 |
| Sibilance | – | – |
| Timbre Color | – | – |
| Tonality | – | 7.0 |
| Texture | – | – |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.