Daybreakvs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Mk12 Turris delivers clearly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Daybreak (7.8 vs 6.5). For comfort fit, It performs faintly better (7.3 vs 6.5). The tactile feel and solidity of It suggest softly greater robustness and longevity compared to the more fragile impression left by Daybreak. Daybreak's accessories are evidently better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Mk12 Turris.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Daybreak (8.5 vs 5.5). It offers d stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where Daybreak feels less assertive (8 vs 6). The bass in It feels m more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to Daybreak (8.5 vs 6). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Daybreak (9 vs 6). It strikes a a better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to Daybreak (8 vs 6.5). It offers m greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that Daybreak misses (9 vs 6.5). It extends d further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Daybreak lacks (9 vs 7). The stereo field on It feels d wider and more holographic, whereas Daybreak sounds more intimate (8 vs 6). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Daybreak (8.5 vs 6). It organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over Daybreak (8.5 vs 6.5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing m better handling of masking than Daybreak (8.5 vs 6.5). It adds a more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Daybreak (8.5 vs 6). It delivers d stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than Daybreak (7.5 vs 5.5). It handles sibilant sounds m more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Daybreak (9.5 vs 6). The tone quality of It feels m more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Daybreak (8.5 vs 5). The overall tonality of It is a more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than Daybreak (8.5 vs 5.5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed n more clearly on It, adding life that Daybreak doesn’t quite match (8 vs 5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.