Gatevs.Variations

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Compared to Gate, Variations creates a materially wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth. For comfort fit, Gate performs faintly better (7.5 vs 7). Even under close inspection, Variations maintains a evidently cleaner, more seamless design — whereas Gate occasionally reveals minor imperfections. Compared to Gate, It’s cable exhibits slightly smoother handling, with fewer instances of memory or stiffness. Accessory-wise, It includes measurably more practical and high-quality items, enhancing both protection and usability.

Sound Characteristics

Variations delivers m tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Gate (6.5 vs 4.5). The low-end on It is m more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Gate (6.5 vs 5). It adds overwhelmingly more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Gate (8.5 vs 4.5). The lower midrange on It blends s more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in Gate (7.5 vs 5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Gate (8 vs 6). It offers m greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that Gate misses (7.5 vs 5.5). It extends s further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Gate lacks (8 vs 5). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Gate (7.5 vs 5). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Gate (8 vs 4.5). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Gate (7 vs 4.5). It avoids frequency masking n more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than Gate (7 vs 4.5). Notes on It feel c more grounded and weighty, whereas Gate can sound thin or hollow (8 vs 5). Percussion and quick attacks feel overwhelmingly more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Gate (8.5 vs 4). Listeners may experience overwhelmingly fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas Gate can get fatiguing (9 vs 3.5). The tone quality of It feels s more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Gate (7.5 vs 4). Tonality on It is a more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than Gate (7 vs 3.5). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered overwhelmingly more vividly by It, while Gate feels flatter (7.5 vs 3.5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.