Hype 4vs.Variations
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Hype 4 | Variations |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Thieaudio | Moondrop |
| Country | China | China |
| IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Hybrid | Tribrid |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
| Shell Material | – | Copper |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 1 |
| Visit Count | 75 | 69 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 3 |
Meta Ratings
Users may find the Hype 4 cable distinctly more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability.
| Hype 4 | Variations | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Comfort Fit | 7.2 | 7.0 |
| Build Quality | 6.8 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Accessories | 6.5 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Variations produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (6.5 vs 6). It adds a more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Hype 4 (8.5 vs 5). It renders lower mids e more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Hype 4 (7.5 vs 6.3). It reproduces female vocals and strings with m more air and forwardness, while Hype 4 remains recessed (8 vs 6). It provides n more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Hype 4 (7.5 vs 6.5). The highest frequencies on It feel d more natural and less rolled-off compared to Hype 4 (8 vs 6.3). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Hype 4 sounds more intimate (7.5 vs 5). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Hype 4 (8 vs 5). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Hype 4 (7 vs 6). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing a better handling of masking than Hype 4 (7 vs 6). The note presentation is a fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than Hype 4 (8 vs 7). It delivers dynamic shifts with a greater impact, making Hype 4 sound comparatively tame (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is overwhelmingly cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that Hype 4 shows (9 vs 4). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Hype 4 (7.5 vs 5). The overall tonality of It is a more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than Hype 4 (7 vs 5). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with a more realism, enhancing emotional depth over Hype 4 (7.5 vs 6).
| Hype 4 | Variations | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Bass | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Bass Feel | 5.0 | 8.5 |
| Lower Mids | 6.3 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Lower Treble | 6.5 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 6.3 | 8.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| Detail | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| Layering | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Masking | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Note Weight | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Sibilance | 4.0 | 9.0 |
| Timbre Color | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| Tonality | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Texture | 6.0 | 7.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.