IER-Z1Rvs.Mk12 Turris
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | IER-Z1R | Mk12 Turris |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Sony | Hidizs |
| Country | – | – |
| IEM Description | Despite their small size, the Sony IER-Z1R earphones feature a sophisticated 3-way design with two dynamic drivers and a highly precise balanced armature. The sound quality is not just high-resolution—it's ultra-high-resolution, reaching an impressive frequency response of up to 100 kHz. Housed in a precisely crafted, virtually resonance-free aluminum shell, the design ensures that all three drivers remain in perfect phase alignment. The cables are fully balanced and made from high-purity OFC copper with silver plating for maximum detail retrieval. | The MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure. |
| Price Level | 2.000 + | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Hybrid | Single Dyn. Driver |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | 3-100.000 Hz | 10-45kHz |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | 32 |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 103 | 111 |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 1 |
| Visit Count | 93 | 13 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
Meta Ratings
IER-Z1R delivers markedly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Mk12 Turris (9.8 vs 7.8). For comfort fit, Mk12 Turris performs barely better (7.3 vs 6.8). The tactile feel and solidity of IER-Z1R suggest distinctly greater robustness and longevity compared to the more fragile impression left by Mk12 Turris. The included cable with It shows considerably better strain relief and physical resilience. Accessory-wise, It includes considerably more practical and high-quality items, enhancing both protection and usability.
| IER-Z1R | Mk12 Turris | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 9.8 | 7.8 |
| Comfort Fit | 6.8 | 7.3 |
| Build Quality | 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Stock Cable | 8.5 | 4.8 |
| Accessories | 8.3 | 5.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on IER-Z1R feels a more natural and authoritative, while Mk12 Turris lacks some reach (9 vs 8.5). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8). It translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Mk12 Turris lacks this tactile feedback (9 vs 8.5). Male vocals and lower instruments sound b richer and better defined on Mk12 Turris, unlike IER-Z1R which can seem hollow (9 vs 8.5). IER-Z1R strikes a a better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to Mk12 Turris (8.5 vs 8). It extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Mk12 Turris lacks (9.5 vs 9). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Mk12 Turris sounds more intimate (10 vs 8). With a higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than Mk12 Turris (9.5 vs 8.5). It separates instruments a more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where Mk12 Turris blends them (9.5 vs 8.5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing a better handling of masking than Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas Mk12 Turris can sound thin or hollow (9 vs 8.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with a greater impact, making Mk12 Turris sound comparatively tame (9 vs 7.5). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that Mk12 Turris lacks (9.5 vs 8.5). It achieves a better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that Mk12 Turris doesn’t quite match (9 vs 8).
| IER-Z1R | Mk12 Turris | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Bass Feel | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Lower Mids | 8.5 | 9.0 |
| Upper Mids | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Upper Treble | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Detail | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Layering | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Masking | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Note Weight | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Slam | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Sibilance | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Timbre Color | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Tonality | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Texture | 9.0 | 8.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.