Libravs.MagicOne
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Libra | MagicOne |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | KZ Earphones | AFUL |
| Country | China | Taiwan |
| IEM Description | – | – |
| Price Level | < 100 | < 100 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Single Dyn. Driver | Single Bal. Armature |
| Driver Types | – | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 26 | 47 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
For comfort fit, Libra performs measurably better (8 vs 6.5). The structural integrity of It is barely more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that MagicOne struggles to match. The stock cable of MagicOne is vastly higher in quality (7.3 vs 3), offering improvements in flexibility, tactile feedback, and resistance to microphonics. Regarding included accessories, It offers a vastly more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
| Libra | MagicOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | – | 6.8 |
| Comfort Fit | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| Build Quality | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Stock Cable | 3.0 | 7.3 |
| Accessories | 2.0 | 6.3 |
Sound Characteristics
// Nothing to compare yet.
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.