Glaciervs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

For comfort fit, Glacier performs subtly better (8.2 vs 7.3). Visually and structurally, It exhibits measurably more polish, suggesting higher-grade materials and a refined aesthetic often lacking in Mk12 Turris. Users may find the It cable materially more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability. Compared to Mk12 Turris, the overall accessory offering from It is considerably more aligned with the expectations of discerning audiophiles.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers n tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Glacier (8.5 vs 7.5). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Glacier (8 vs 7.5). It adds b more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Glacier (8.5 vs 8). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on It, unlike Glacier which can seem hollow (9 vs 7). In the upper mids, It sounds a clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than Glacier (8 vs 7.3). It provides d more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Glacier (9 vs 7.5). It captures ambient cues and reverbs n more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over Glacier (9 vs 8). Glacier creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Mk12 Turris (8.5 vs 8). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Track elements feel b more isolated and clean on Mk12 Turris, offering clearer focus than Glacier (8.5 vs 8). It keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Glacier (8.5 vs 7.5). The note presentation is n fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than Glacier (8.5 vs 6). It controls harsh sibilant peaks e more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Glacier (9.5 vs 8.5). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Glacier (8.5 vs 7.5). Tonality on It is a more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than Glacier (8.5 vs 7). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered a more vividly by It, while Glacier feels flatter (8 vs 7.5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.