Isabellaevs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Especially for complex musical passages, Mk12 Turris handles layering and imaging readably more confidently and precisely. For comfort fit, Isabellae performs faintly better (7.8 vs 7.3). Mk12 Turris shows clearly superior build quality than Isabellae (7.5 vs 6.3), indicating better materials, construction precision, and overall durability. The stock cable of Isabellae is significantly higher in quality (6.3 vs 4.8), offering improvements in flexibility, tactile feedback, and resistance to microphonics. It's accessories are noticeably better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Mk12 Turris.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers n tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Isabellae (8.5 vs 5.8). It renders bass with a greater punch and separation, where Isabellae sometimes feels bloated (8 vs 6.5). It translates bass vibrations into a c more visceral experience, while Isabellae lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 6). The lower midrange on It blends n more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in Isabellae (9 vs 6.5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Isabellae (8 vs 6.8). The treble on It is c more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (9 vs 6.5). It captures ambient cues and reverbs a more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over Isabellae (9 vs 7). It creates a n wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Isabellae (8 vs 6.8). With c higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than Isabellae (8.5 vs 6). It organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.3). It keeps competing frequencies under control c more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Isabellae (8.5 vs 5.5). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.5). Percussion and quick attacks feel s more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Isabellae (7.5 vs 6). The upper range of vocals is overwhelmingly cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that Isabellae shows (9.5 vs 3.3). It renders timbres with d better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.3). It achieves s better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.5). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with s more realism, enhancing emotional depth over Isabellae (8 vs 6).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.