AVG. Rating
7.6
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
7.2

Lunavs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

36%
Luna
Absolute Score: 68.6%
64%
Mk12 Turris
Absolute Score: 79.3%

Total categories compared: 29

Winner:Mk12 Turris

( leads by 120.0% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoLunaMk12 Turris
BrandDUNUHidizs
CountryChina
IEM DescriptionThe DUNU Luna represents a pinnacle of refinement and innovation in the IEM world. With a sound that is both highly detailed and effortlessly natural, it’s built for audiophiles who demand resolution, realism, and an uncompromising listening experience.The MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure.
Price Level500 – 1.000100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigSingle Dyn. Driver
Driver TypesDynamic DriverDynamic Driver
Shell Material
CableMixed Strands of Furukawa Electric Ohno Continuous Cast (OCC) Copper & DHC Silver, with Silver-Plated OCC Copper Shield Surround
Technical
Freq Range5 Hz - 40 kHz10-45kHz
Impedance (Ω)1632
Sensitivity (dB)110111
Crossover
Platform Info
Comments21
Visit Count1113
External Reviews21

Meta Ratings

The structural integrity of Luna is clearly more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that Mk12 Turris struggles to match.

Sound
Comfort Fit
Build Quality
Stock Cable
Accessories
LunaMk12 Turris
Sound
7.8
7.8
Comfort Fit
7.5
7.3
Build Quality
8.5
7.5
Stock Cable
4.8
Accessories
5.0

Sound Characteristics

Low-frequency extension on Mk12 Turris feels n more natural and authoritative, while Luna lacks some reach (8.5 vs 6). It renders bass with d greater punch and separation, where Luna sometimes feels bloated (8 vs 6.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It m more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 6). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Luna (9 vs 5.5). Upper mids are b more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Luna (8 vs 7.5). It provides a more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Luna (9 vs 8.5). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Luna (8 vs 6.5). Luna retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Mk12 Turris shows a better control of masking effects, maintaining clarity across frequency ranges better than Luna (8.5 vs 8). Notes played through It feel s weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from Luna (8.5 vs 5). It delivers s stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than Luna (7.5 vs 5.5). It handles sibilant sounds a more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Luna (9.5 vs 7). The tone quality of It feels m more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Luna (8.5 vs 6.5). Across the frequency range, It stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Luna (8.5 vs 7). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that Luna doesn’t quite match (8 vs 7.5).

LunaMk12 Turris
Sub Bass
6.0
8.5
Bass
6.5
8.0
Bass Feel
6.0
8.5
Lower Mids
5.5
9.0
Upper Mids
7.5
8.0
Lower Treble
8.5
9.0
Upper Treble
9.0
9.0
Sound Stage Width
6.5
8.0
Detail
9.0
8.5
Layering
8.5
8.5
Masking
8.0
8.5
Note Weight
5.0
8.5
Slam
5.5
7.5
Sibilance
7.0
9.5
Timbre Color
6.5
8.5
Tonality
7.0
8.5
Texture
7.5
8.0

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.