Mk12 Turrisvs.Performer 5+2 (Performer 7)
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Mk12 Turris | Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hidizs | AFUL |
| Country | – | Taiwan |
| IEM Description | The MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure. | AFUL Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) delivers a dynamic and engaging listening experience with deep, controlled bass, clear mids, and airy treble. Its tuning strikes a balance between technical precision and musical enjoyment, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of genres. Crafted with precision acoustic design and a modern, ergonomic shell, it offers both comfort and performance in a sleek package. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Single Dyn. Driver | Tribrid |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver | Micro Planar Tweeter + Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | 10-45kHz | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | 32 | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 111 | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 1 | 1 |
| Visit Count | 13 | 264 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
Meta Ratings
For comfort fit, Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) performs subtly better (8.1 vs 7.3). The structural integrity of Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) is subtly more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that Mk12 Turris struggles to match. The included cable with Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) shows notably better strain relief and physical resilience. Performer 5+2 (Performer 7)'s accessories are distinctly better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Mk12 Turris.
| Mk12 Turris | Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Comfort Fit | 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Build Quality | 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Stock Cable | 4.8 | 7.4 |
| Accessories | 5.0 | 7.2 |
Sound Characteristics
Mk12 Turris produces sub-bass that is m more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (8.5 vs 5.5). The low-end on It is s more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8 vs 6.3). It adds s more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7). It renders lower mids m more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (9 vs 7.3). It provides m more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (9 vs 7). It captures ambient cues and reverbs a more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (9 vs 7.7). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) sounds more intimate (8 vs 7.5). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7.7). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7.8). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7.8). Notes on It feel s more grounded and weighty, whereas Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) can sound thin or hollow (8.5 vs 6.8). Percussion and quick attacks feel a more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (7.5 vs 6.5). It controls harsh sibilant peaks overwhelmingly more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (9.5 vs 5.5). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) feels slightly more artificial or colored (8.5 vs 7). Tonality on It is a more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7.7). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) doesn’t quite match (8 vs 6.8).
| Mk12 Turris | Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 8.5 | 5.8 |
| Bass | 8.0 | 6.7 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Lower Mids | 9.0 | 7.3 |
| Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 6.4 |
| Upper Treble | 9.0 | 7.8 |
| Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Detail | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Layering | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Masking | 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Note Weight | 8.5 | 6.8 |
| Slam | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Sibilance | 9.5 | 5.5 |
| Timbre Color | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Tonality | 8.5 | 7.7 |
| Texture | 8.0 | 6.8 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.