AVG. Rating
7.2
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
6.9

Mk12 Turrisvs.SA6 Mk2

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

69%
Mk12 Turris
Absolute Score: 79.3%
31%
SA6 Mk2
Absolute Score: 74.3%

Total categories compared: 29

Winner:Mk12 Turris

( leads by 75.2% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoMk12 TurrisSA6 Mk2
BrandHidizsDUNU
CountryChina
IEM DescriptionThe MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure.
Price Level100 – 500100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigSingle Dyn. DriverMulti-BA
Driver TypesDynamic DriverBalanced Armature
Shell Material
Cable
Technical
Freq Range10-45kHz
Impedance (Ω)32
Sensitivity (dB)111
Crossover
Platform Info
Comments10
Visit Count13128
External Reviews11

Meta Ratings

SA6 Mk2 delivers slightly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Mk12 Turris (8.3 vs 7.8). For comfort fit, Mk12 Turris performs softly better (7.3 vs 6.6). Users may find the SA6 Mk2 cable considerably more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability. Accessory-wise, It includes measurably more practical and high-quality items, enhancing both protection and usability.

Sound
Comfort Fit
Build Quality
Stock Cable
Accessories
Mk12 TurrisSA6 Mk2
Sound
7.8
8.3
Comfort Fit
7.3
6.9
Build Quality
7.5
7.5
Stock Cable
4.8
7.8
Accessories
5.0
7.0

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (8.5 vs 6). It enhances basslines with a more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to SA6 Mk2 (8 vs 7). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It b more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 8). It achieves d better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (9 vs 7.3). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with m more brilliance on It, while SA6 Mk2 sounds slightly dull (9 vs 7.3). The highest frequencies on It feel b more natural and less rolled-off compared to SA6 Mk2 (9 vs 8.3). It paints a c broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (8 vs 7). It retrieves micro-details n more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7.3). It organizes musical elements m better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 6.8). It shows s better control of masking effects, maintaining clarity across frequency ranges better than SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas SA6 Mk2 can sound thin or hollow (8.5 vs 7.3). It hits with a more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than SA6 Mk2 (7.5 vs 7). It controls harsh sibilant peaks m more effectively, making vocals smoother than on SA6 Mk2 (9.5 vs 6.8). It renders timbres with d better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7). Across the frequency range, It stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7.8). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed b more clearly on It, adding life that SA6 Mk2 doesn’t quite match (8 vs 7.3).

Mk12 TurrisSA6 Mk2
Sub Bass
8.5
6.0
Bass
8.0
7.0
Bass Feel
8.5
8.0
Lower Mids
9.0
7.3
Upper Mids
8.0
7.8
Lower Treble
9.0
7.3
Upper Treble
9.0
8.3
Sound Stage Width
8.0
7.0
Detail
8.5
7.3
Layering
8.5
6.8
Masking
8.5
7.0
Note Weight
8.5
7.3
Slam
7.5
7.0
Sibilance
9.5
6.8
Timbre Color
8.5
7.0
Tonality
8.5
7.8
Texture
8.0
7.3

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.