Mk12 Turrisvs.SuperMix 4

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, Mk12 Turris conveys sound with distinctly enhanced finesse and resolution. For comfort fit, SuperMix 4 performs slightly better (8 vs 7.3). Visually and structurally, Mk12 Turris exhibits barely more polish, suggesting higher-grade materials and a refined aesthetic often lacking in SuperMix 4. The stock cable of SuperMix 4 is faintly higher in quality (5.5 vs 4.8), offering improvements in flexibility, tactile feedback, and resistance to microphonics. Compared to SuperMix 4, the overall accessory offering from Mk12 Turris is significantly more aligned with the expectations of discerning audiophiles.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers m deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 6). It offers s stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where SuperMix 4 feels less assertive (8 vs 5.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It a more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 5.5). It renders lower mids overwhelmingly more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than SuperMix 4 (9 vs 4.5). In the upper mids, It sounds m clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than SuperMix 4 (8 vs 6.5). It provides a more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than SuperMix 4 (9 vs 7). The highest frequencies on It feel m more natural and less rolled-off compared to SuperMix 4 (9 vs 7). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 7). Track elements feel s more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 6). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 5.5). It adds overwhelmingly more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 4.5). It delivers m stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than SuperMix 4 (7.5 vs 5.5). Listeners may experience a fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas SuperMix 4 can get fatiguing (9.5 vs 8.5). The tone quality of It feels c more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 6). Across the frequency range, It stays n more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than SuperMix 4 (8.5 vs 6). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered c more vividly by It, while SuperMix 4 feels flatter (8 vs 5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.