Mk12 Turrisvs.Tea Pro

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Mk12 Turris reveals microdetails and transient responses with subtly better articulation, helping listeners uncover nuances often missed with Tea Pro. For comfort fit, It performs subtly better (7.3 vs 6.5). The tactile feel and solidity of It suggest clearly greater robustness and longevity compared to the more fragile impression left by Tea Pro. The included cable with Tea Pro shows distinctly better strain relief and physical resilience. From the case design to ear tip variety, It provides a readably more thoughtful unboxing experience.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (8.5 vs 6). It enhances basslines with n more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Tea Pro (8 vs 7). It translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Tea Pro lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 7). It renders lower mids a more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Tea Pro (9 vs 6.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with a more air and forwardness, while Tea Pro remains recessed (8 vs 6). It offers d greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that Tea Pro misses (9 vs 7). The upper treble of It extends a further, offering more sparkle and openness than Tea Pro (9 vs 8). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Tea Pro sounds more intimate (8 vs 7). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while Tea Pro tends to gloss over them (8.5 vs 7). It organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over Tea Pro (8.5 vs 7). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing a better handling of masking than Tea Pro (8.5 vs 6.5). It adds a more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Tea Pro (8.5 vs 7). It delivers a stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than Tea Pro (7.5 vs 7). Listeners may experience a fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas Tea Pro can get fatiguing (9.5 vs 6). It renders timbres with s better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Tea Pro (8.5 vs 7). The overall tonality of It is d more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than Tea Pro (8.5 vs 6.5). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with m more realism, enhancing emotional depth over Tea Pro (8 vs 6).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.