Mk12 Turrisvs.Zenith
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Mk12 Turris | Zenith |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hidizs | KZ Earphones |
| Country | – | China |
| IEM Description | The MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure. | The KZ Zenith is a budget-friendly in-ear monitor that aims to deliver a fun and energetic sound signature. Designed with casual listeners in mind, it typically features boosted bass and lively treble, making it well-suited for modern genres like pop, EDM, and hip-hop. It’s a straightforward, no-frills option for those looking to upgrade from basic earbuds without breaking the bank. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | < 100 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Single Dyn. Driver | Single Dyn. Driver |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver | Dynamic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | 10-45kHz | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | 32 | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 111 | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 1 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 13 | 69 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
Zenith delivers softly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Mk12 Turris (8.5 vs 7.8). For comfort fit, It performs slightly better (8 vs 7.3). From the connector housings to the shell seams, It demonstrates measurably tighter tolerances and higher production standards.
| Mk12 Turris | Zenith | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Fit | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| Build Quality | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| Stock Cable | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Accessories | 5.0 | – |
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on Mk12 Turris feels overwhelmingly more natural and authoritative, while Zenith lacks some reach (8.5 vs 2). It enhances basslines with overwhelmingly more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Zenith (8 vs 4). It translates bass vibrations into a overwhelmingly more visceral experience, while Zenith lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 3). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (9 vs 6.5). In the upper mids, Zenith sounds a clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than Mk12 Turris (8.5 vs 8). Mk12 Turris provides b more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Zenith (9 vs 8.5). The highest frequencies on It feel b more natural and less rolled-off compared to Zenith (9 vs 8.5). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Zenith sounds more intimate (8 vs 7.5). In complex arrangements, It separates layers d more distinctly, preventing overlap that Zenith occasionally suffers (8.5 vs 6.5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing a better handling of masking than Zenith (8.5 vs 6.5). It adds m more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Zenith (8.5 vs 6.5). Percussion and quick attacks feel overwhelmingly more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Zenith (7.5 vs 3). Listeners may experience overwhelmingly fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas Zenith can get fatiguing (9.5 vs 2.5). Zenith presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that Mk12 Turris lacks (9.5 vs 8.5). It achieves n better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Mk12 Turris (9.5 vs 8.5). It renders texture a more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than Mk12 Turris (9.5 vs 8).
| Mk12 Turris | Zenith | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 8.5 | 2.0 |
| Bass | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 3.0 |
| Lower Mids | 9.0 | 6.5 |
| Upper Mids | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Upper Treble | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Detail | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Layering | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Masking | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Note Weight | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Slam | 7.5 | 3.0 |
| Sibilance | 9.5 | 2.5 |
| Timbre Color | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Tonality | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Texture | 8.0 | 9.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.