CP622Bvs.Odin
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | CP622B | Odin |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canpur | Empire Ears |
| Country | South Korea | – |
| IEM Description | The Canpur CP622B is a flagship in-ear monitor that turned heads at CanJam SoCal 2023, earning strong praise from audiophiles for its exceptional sound and refined design. Originating from a rising EU-based brand, the CP622B quickly stood out as more than a fleeting trend, delivering a listening experience that blends technical precision with musical engagement. This in-depth review explores what makes the CP622B a lasting favorite in the high-end IEM market. | – |
| Price Level | 2.000 + | 2.000 + |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Tribrid | Tribrid |
| Driver Types | Bone Conduction + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic | Balanced Armature + Dynamic Driver + Electrostatic |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 16 | 15 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
// Nothing to compare yet.
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on CP622B feels s more natural and authoritative, while Odin lacks some reach (9 vs 8.5). It enhances basslines with a more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Odin (9 vs 8.5). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (9 vs 7.5). In the upper mids, It sounds m clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than Odin (9 vs 7.5). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with a more brilliance on It, while Odin sounds slightly dull (9 vs 7.5). It extends m further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Odin lacks (9 vs 7.5). Instruments remain intelligible on Odin even during busy sections, showing b better handling of masking than CP622B (8.5 vs 8). CP622B delivers a stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than Odin (8.5 vs 8).
| CP622B | Odin | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Lower Mids | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | – | – |
| Detail | 9.0 | – |
| Layering | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Masking | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Note Weight | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Slam | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Sibilance | – | – |
| Timbre Color | – | – |
| Tonality | – | – |
| Texture | – | – |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.