EDC Provs.Project Meta
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | EDC Pro | Project Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | KZ Earphones | CrinEar |
| Country | China | – |
| IEM Description | – | A debut IEM by Crinacle's CrinEar: a compact, full-aluminum flagship tuned to a “tilted Diffuse Field + bass boost” curve. Delivers vibrant mids, warm sub-bass, and clear treble—crafted for musical accuracy and comfort. |
| Price Level | < 100 | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Single Dyn. Driver | – |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 31 | 96 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 1 |
Meta Ratings
For comfort fit, EDC Pro performs readably better (7.8 vs 6.5). The tactile feel and solidity of Project Meta suggest evidently greater robustness and longevity compared to the more fragile impression left by EDC Pro. It’s cable appears significantly more premium in both aesthetics and function, from its braid quality to termination. Regarding included accessories, It offers a substantially more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
| EDC Pro | Project Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| Build Quality | 5.8 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Accessories | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on Project Meta feels a more natural and authoritative, while EDC Pro lacks some reach (6 vs 5). EDC Pro offers s stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where Project Meta feels less assertive (8 vs 6). It translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Project Meta lacks this tactile feedback (7 vs 6.5). The lower midrange on It blends s more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in Project Meta (7 vs 6.5). In the upper mids, It sounds s clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than Project Meta (6 vs 5.5). Project Meta offers a greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that EDC Pro misses (7.5 vs 7). The upper treble of It extends m further, offering more sparkle and openness than EDC Pro (6.5 vs 5). The stereo field on It feels n wider and more holographic, whereas EDC Pro sounds more intimate (6 vs 3). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while EDC Pro tends to gloss over them (6 vs 5). It separates instruments c more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where EDC Pro blends them (6.5 vs 3). It shows m better control of masking effects, maintaining clarity across frequency ranges better than EDC Pro (5.5 vs 3). It adds a more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to EDC Pro (6 vs 5). It hits with n more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than EDC Pro (6 vs 5). Listeners may experience m fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas EDC Pro can get fatiguing (6.5 vs 3). It renders timbres with c better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than EDC Pro (6 vs 5). Across the frequency range, It stays m more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than EDC Pro (6 vs 4). EDC Pro portrays textures in vocals and strings with s more realism, enhancing emotional depth over Project Meta (7 vs 5.5).
| EDC Pro | Project Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Bass | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| Bass Feel | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Lower Mids | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Upper Mids | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Lower Treble | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 3.0 | 6.0 |
| Detail | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Layering | 3.0 | 6.5 |
| Masking | 3.0 | 5.5 |
| Note Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Slam | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Sibilance | 3.0 | 6.5 |
| Timbre Color | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Tonality | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| Texture | 7.0 | 5.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.