Hexavs.Project Meta
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Hexa | Project Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Truthear | CrinEar |
| Country | China | – |
| IEM Description | HEXA is a high-performance hybrid IEM featuring one 10mm dynamic driver and three balanced armature drivers for a clean, balanced sound. Designed with a DLP-3D printed resin cavity and metal faceplate, it combines precision engineering with comfort. The bass is deep and punchy, the mids are clean and natural, and the highs are smooth and detailed. Its medical-grade shell, reliable build, and premium silver-plated cable make HEXA a standout in its class—offering refined audio performance at an accessible price point. | A debut IEM by Crinacle's CrinEar: a compact, full-aluminum flagship tuned to a “tilted Diffuse Field + bass boost” curve. Delivers vibrant mids, warm sub-bass, and clear treble—crafted for musical accuracy and comfort. |
| Price Level | < 100 | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Hybrid | – |
| Driver Types | Balanced Armature + Dynamic Driver | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | Four Stands of High-quality Silver-plated Cable | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | 8-40kHz (IEC61094, Free Field) | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | 20.5 | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 120 | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 95 | 96 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
Meta Ratings
Compared to Project Meta, Hexa creates a measurably wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth. Even under close inspection, It maintains a noticeably cleaner, more seamless design — whereas Project Meta occasionally reveals minor imperfections. The stock cable of Project Meta is readably higher in quality (6.5 vs 5.3), offering improvements in flexibility, tactile feedback, and resistance to microphonics. Regarding included accessories, It offers a noticeably more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
| Hexa | Project Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 8.5 | 7.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 7.2 | 6.5 |
| Build Quality | 7.7 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | 5.3 | 6.5 |
| Accessories | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Hexa produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (9 vs 6). It enhances basslines with m more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Project Meta (7.5 vs 6). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on It, unlike Project Meta which can seem hollow (7.5 vs 6.5). Upper mids are d more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Project Meta (7.5 vs 5.5). It provides c more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than Project Meta (8.5 vs 7.5). It extends m further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Project Meta lacks (8.5 vs 6.5). Listeners may notice that Project Meta presents sounds with b more lateral space, giving recordings more openness than Hexa (6 vs 5.5). Hexa retrieves micro-details m more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Project Meta (8.2 vs 6). In complex arrangements, It separates layers a more distinctly, preventing overlap that Project Meta occasionally suffers (8.5 vs 6.5). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than Project Meta (6 vs 5.5). Project Meta hits with a more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than Hexa (6 vs 3.5). Listeners may experience s fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with Hexa, whereas Project Meta can get fatiguing (10 vs 6.5). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas Project Meta feels slightly more artificial or colored (8.5 vs 6). Across the frequency range, It stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Project Meta (9 vs 6). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed overwhelmingly more clearly on It, adding life that Project Meta doesn’t quite match (10 vs 5.5).
| Hexa | Project Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Bass | 7.5 | 6.0 |
| Bass Feel | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Lower Mids | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Upper Mids | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| Lower Treble | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 5.5 | 6.0 |
| Detail | 7.5 | 6.0 |
| Layering | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Masking | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Note Weight | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Slam | 3.5 | 6.0 |
| Sibilance | 10.0 | 6.5 |
| Timbre Color | 8.5 | 6.0 |
| Tonality | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Texture | 10.0 | 5.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.