Project Metavs.x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Project Meta | x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CrinEar | 7Hz |
| Country | – | UK |
| IEM Description | A debut IEM by Crinacle's CrinEar: a compact, full-aluminum flagship tuned to a “tilted Diffuse Field + bass boost” curve. Delivers vibrant mids, warm sub-bass, and clear treble—crafted for musical accuracy and comfort. | 7Hz x Crinacle Salnotes Dioko is a budget planar magnetic IEM featuring a 14.6 mm dual‑cavity planar diaphragm driver and high‑grade aluminum housing. With Crinacle‑approved tuning, it offers clear mids, airy treble, and crisp bass response, all bundled with premium accessories like a detachable OCC‑copper braided cable and over‑engineered carrying case. A standout value under ~$100 in audiophile in-ear monitors. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | – | Planar Magnetic |
| Driver Types | – | Planar Magnetic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | Aviation Aluminium Housing |
| Cable | – | Removable 4-Core Litz OCC Copper Cable |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | 5-40000 hz |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | 16 |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | 106 |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 96 | 16 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
// Nothing to compare yet.
Sound Characteristics
x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko delivers s tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Project Meta (6.5 vs 6). Listeners may find the low-end impact on Project Meta a more engaging during high-dynamic passages (6.5 vs 5.5). x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko strikes a d better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to Project Meta (7.5 vs 5.5). It offers b greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that Project Meta misses (8 vs 7.5). The highest frequencies on It feel c more natural and less rolled-off compared to Project Meta (7.5 vs 6.5). It paints a a broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (6.5 vs 6). It extracts low-level details m more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Project Meta (8.5 vs 6). It organizes musical elements s better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over Project Meta (8 vs 6.5). It keeps competing frequencies under control m more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Project Meta (8.5 vs 5.5). Notes on Project Meta feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko can sound thin or hollow (6 vs 5.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with a greater impact, making x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko sound comparatively tame (6 vs 4.5). It handles sibilant sounds a more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko (6.5 vs 6). The tone quality of x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Project Meta (6.5 vs 6). It achieves n better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Project Meta (7 vs 6). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered s more vividly by It, while Project Meta feels flatter (7.5 vs 5.5).
| Project Meta | x Crinacle: Salnotes Dioko | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Bass | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bass Feel | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Lower Mids | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Upper Mids | 5.5 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Upper Treble | 6.5 | 7.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Detail | 6.0 | 8.5 |
| Layering | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| Masking | 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Note Weight | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Slam | 6.0 | 4.5 |
| Sibilance | 6.5 | 6.0 |
| Timbre Color | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Tonality | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Texture | 5.5 | 7.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.