Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | SA6 Mk2 | Variations |
---|---|---|
Brand | DUNU | Moondrop |
Country | China | China |
IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Multi-BA | Tribrid |
Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
Shell Material | – | Copper |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 1 |
Visit Count | 128 | 69 |
External Reviews | 1 | 3 |
In terms of overall sound impression, SA6 Mk2 notably outshines Variations. It presents music with significantly greater accuracy, air, and stereo separation (8.3 vs 6.5). It shows noticeably superior build quality than Variations (7.5 vs 6.5), indicating better materials, construction precision, and overall durability. It’s cable appears measurably more premium in both aesthetics and function, from its braid quality to termination. It's accessories are softly better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Variations.
SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 8.3 | 6.5 |
Comfort Fit | 6.9 | 7.0 |
Build Quality | 7.5 | 6.5 |
Stock Cable | 7.8 | 5.5 |
Accessories | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Variations delivers s deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than SA6 Mk2 (6.5 vs 6). SA6 Mk2 renders bass with s greater punch and separation, where Variations sometimes feels bloated (7 vs 6.5). Variations adds a more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 8). It paints a s broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (7.5 vs 7). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while SA6 Mk2 tends to gloss over them (8 vs 7.3). Notes played through It feel b weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from SA6 Mk2 (8 vs 7.3). It delivers m stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is d cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that SA6 Mk2 shows (9 vs 6.8). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that SA6 Mk2 lacks (7.5 vs 7). Across the frequency range, SA6 Mk2 stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Variations (7.8 vs 7).
SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Bass | 7.0 | 6.5 |
Bass Feel | 8.0 | 8.5 |
Lower Mids | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Upper Mids | 7.8 | 8.0 |
Lower Treble | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 8.3 | 8.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Detail | 7.3 | 8.0 |
Layering | 6.8 | 7.0 |
Masking | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Note Weight | 7.3 | 8.0 |
Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
Sibilance | 6.8 | 9.0 |
Timbre Color | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Tonality | 7.8 | 7.0 |
Texture | 7.3 | 7.5 |
// Nothing to compare yet.