Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Castor | Timeless 2 (II) |
---|---|---|
Brand | KZ Earphones | 7Hz |
Country | China | UK |
IEM Description | The KZ Castor brings an engaging and lively sound signature tailored for everyday enjoyment. With its bold tuning and modern presentation, it’s designed for listeners who want excitement and energy without breaking the bank. | – |
Price Level | < 100 | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Multi Dyn. Driver | Planar Magnetic |
Driver Types | – | Planar Magnetic Driver |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 1 | 0 |
Visit Count | 40 | 101 |
External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Sound-wise, Timeless 2 (II) provides a distinctly more refined presentation, with improved detail retrieval, microdynamics, and instrument layering when compared to Castor (9 vs 7). For comfort fit, Timeless 2 (II) performs markedly better (8.8 vs 7). Craftsmanship-wise, Timeless 2 (II) feels measurably more meticulously assembled, reflecting a level of engineering and attention to detail that elevates the product. Users may find the Timeless 2 (II) cable measurably more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability. Timeless 2 (II)'s accessories are vastly better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Castor.
Castor | Timeless 2 (II) | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 7.0 | 9.0 |
Comfort Fit | 7.0 | 8.8 |
Build Quality | 7.0 | 8.8 |
Stock Cable | 3.0 | 4.8 |
Accessories | 2.0 | 8.3 |
// Nothing to compare yet.
// Nothing to compare yet.