AVG. Rating
6.3
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
7.0

Hype 4vs.Variations

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

43%
Hype 4
Absolute Score: 62.2%
57%
Variations
Absolute Score: 71.4%

Total categories compared: 29

Winner:Variations

( leads by 106.6% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoHype 4Variations
BrandThieaudioMoondrop
CountryChinaChina
IEM DescriptionMoondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature.
Price Level100 – 500500 – 1.000
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigHybridTribrid
Driver TypesDynamic Driver + Balanced ArmatureDynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic
Shell MaterialCopper
Cable
Technical
Freq Range9-40,000 Hz
Impedance (Ω)
Sensitivity (dB)
Crossover
Platform Info
Comments01
Visit Count7569
External Reviews03

Meta Ratings

Cable-wise, Hype 4 is markedly better built, featuring sturdier connectors and less tangling — traits where Variations falls slightly short.

Sound
Comfort Fit
Build Quality
Stock Cable
Accessories
Hype 4Variations
Sound
6.7
6.5
Comfort Fit
7.2
7.0
Build Quality
6.8
6.5
Stock Cable
7.1
5.5
Accessories
6.5
6.0

Sound Characteristics

Variations delivers b tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Hype 4 (6.5 vs 6). It translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Hype 4 lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 5). The lower midrange on It blends a more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in Hype 4 (7.5 vs 6.3). In the upper mids, It sounds m clearer and more articulate, highlighting vocals and lead instruments better than Hype 4 (8 vs 6). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with a more brilliance on It, while Hype 4 sounds slightly dull (7.5 vs 6.5). It extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Hype 4 lacks (8 vs 6.3). Listeners may notice that It presents sounds with c more lateral space, giving recordings more openness than Hype 4 (7.5 vs 5). It extracts low-level details a more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Hype 4 (8 vs 5). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Hype 4 (7 vs 6). It shows a better control of masking effects, maintaining clarity across frequency ranges better than Hype 4 (7 vs 6). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from Hype 4 (8 vs 7). It delivers dynamic shifts with s greater impact, making Hype 4 sound comparatively tame (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is overwhelmingly cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that Hype 4 shows (9 vs 4). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that Hype 4 lacks (7.5 vs 5). It achieves d better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Hype 4 (7 vs 5). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with m more realism, enhancing emotional depth over Hype 4 (7.5 vs 6).

Hype 4Variations
Sub Bass
6.0
6.5
Bass
6.5
6.5
Bass Feel
5.0
8.5
Lower Mids
6.3
7.5
Upper Mids
6.0
8.0
Lower Treble
6.5
7.5
Upper Treble
6.3
8.0
Sound Stage Width
5.0
7.5
Detail
5.0
8.0
Layering
6.0
7.0
Masking
6.0
7.0
Note Weight
7.0
8.0
Slam
7.0
8.5
Sibilance
4.0
9.0
Timbre Color
5.0
7.5
Tonality
5.0
7.0
Texture
6.0
7.5

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.