SA6 Mk2vs.Variations
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | SA6 Mk2 | Variations |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | DUNU | Moondrop |
| Country | China | China |
| IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Multi-BA | Tribrid |
| Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
| Shell Material | – | Copper |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 1 |
| Visit Count | 128 | 69 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 3 |
Meta Ratings
SA6 Mk2 delivers markedly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Variations (8.3 vs 6.5). While Variations is passable in its design, It stands evidently above, particularly in terms of assembly quality, material choice, and finish. Compared to Variations, It’s cable exhibits significantly smoother handling, with fewer instances of memory or stiffness. It's accessories are slightly better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Variations.
| SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 8.3 | 6.5 |
| Comfort Fit | 6.9 | 7.0 |
| Build Quality | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Accessories | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Variations produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (6.5 vs 6). SA6 Mk2 renders bass with a greater punch and separation, where Variations sometimes feels bloated (7 vs 6.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on Variations s more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 8). It paints a a broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (7.5 vs 7). With a higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than SA6 Mk2 (8 vs 7.3). The note presentation is a fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than SA6 Mk2 (8 vs 7.3). It hits with s more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is s cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that SA6 Mk2 shows (9 vs 6.8). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas SA6 Mk2 feels slightly more artificial or colored (7.5 vs 7). Tonality on SA6 Mk2 is a more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than Variations (7.8 vs 7).
| SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Bass | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Bass Feel | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Lower Mids | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| Lower Treble | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Detail | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| Layering | 6.8 | 7.0 |
| Masking | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Note Weight | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Sibilance | 6.8 | 9.0 |
| Timbre Color | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Tonality | 7.8 | 7.0 |
| Texture | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.