Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Timeless 2 (II) | ZVX |
---|---|---|
Brand | 7Hz | KZ Earphones |
Country | UK | China |
IEM Description | – | KZ’s ZVX is all about value-driven performance, delivering a bold, V-shaped sound that’s perfect for modern genres. It’s a crowd-pleaser that brings surprising punch and clarity to the budget segment. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | < 100 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Planar Magnetic | Single Dyn. Driver |
Driver Types | Planar Magnetic Driver | – |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 0 |
Visit Count | 101 | 45 |
External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Sound-wise, Timeless 2 (II) provides a measurably more refined presentation, with improved detail retrieval, microdynamics, and instrument layering when compared to ZVX (9 vs 7). For comfort fit, Timeless 2 (II) performs significantly better (8.8 vs 7). Timeless 2 (II) shows barely superior build quality than ZVX (8.8 vs 8), indicating better materials, construction precision, and overall durability. Timeless 2 (II)’s cable appears measurably more premium in both aesthetics and function, from its braid quality to termination. Timeless 2 (II)’s bundled components feel decisively more premium, suggesting a stronger focus on user satisfaction and long-term value.
Timeless 2 (II) | ZVX | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 9.0 | 7.0 |
Comfort Fit | 8.8 | 7.0 |
Build Quality | 8.8 | 8.0 |
Stock Cable | 4.8 | 3.0 |
Accessories | 8.3 | 2.0 |
// Nothing to compare yet.
// Nothing to compare yet.